Dear Mr. Levy, et al:
Want to know what's bugging me? Mosquitoes? No. Getting a fine mist of toxic chemicals sprayed over my area for a potential threat of catching a potentially fatal bug spread virus is flaming my ire.
Look at the stats for 2009:
U.S. Population: 305,529,237 (estimated)Want to know what's bugging me? Mosquitoes? No. Getting a fine mist of toxic chemicals sprayed over my area for a potential threat of catching a potentially fatal bug spread virus is flaming my ire.
Look at the stats for 2009:
Total number of West Nile Infections: 720*
Fatalities from West Nile: 32*
Even the year with the highest number of cases in 2001 the risk was still minuscule.
Is this worth dousing people with known liver tumor producing and fish killing chemical warfare in light of the statistics? Who makes the decision on who gets toxic crap dumped on them and who gets spared? Not the people getting doused, that is for sure. Indeed I know there is the "no spray" list, which does not help people that rent and does nothing for aerial spraying. Look at the stats of how many people died from cancer last year and compare that to the risk of West Nile infections and fatalities. It is frightening that the powers that be are that short sighted that they cannot properly weigh the risks and benefits. These chemicals are toxic and will absolutely have an impact on the environment, people and ecosystem.
Thank you for reading my rant.
Sincerely,
Melissa S****** (nee M*********)
*stats published by the CDC
2 comments:
Good for you for voicing your concerns! There has to be a better way to protect people. Last week our kitchen got sprayed for those tiny little ants that make a pest of themselves. There was so much spray that I was smelling it for hours. Gross. That is the last time I let him spray chemicals like that.
I got a reply from someone in Levy's office saying that it was getting forwarded. Blah, blah blah
Post a Comment